Better than Iron Man? Discuss.

(I thought the story was better in Iron Man, but the action was better in The Hulk, so I'd probably elect to see it again rather than Iron Man again, if I had to choose between the two movies).

Iron Man definately had more of a story to it mainly due to the fact that (this time around) the writers of The Hulk make the assumption that you're pretty aware of the Hulk's origin. Honestly, who can blame them? If you want to see the Hulk you likely know the origin story. So rather then bore you with the details they throw you straight into the story/action.

The thing that impressed me more was that the "Final Fight" between Hulk and The Abomination (I say final because there is more then one fight between the two characters) was about 10x better then the fight at the Iron Man. Back in the Iron Man post when someone said the fight should've been "more", you get it with this one.

I'd definitely see Hulk again, I think everyone in it did a pretty fantastic job. I don't think Hulk was better then Iron Man per say, I'd say Hulk had some elements Iron Man lacked to make it an even better Comic Book Character movie.

Lets hope Punisher: Warzone continues Marvel's winning streak.

_________________

I have to agree with Kham for the most part.

If were to choose which movie I'd see a second time I would give the nod to The Hulk for the increased action elements, and would add that I thought Edward Norton did as excellent a job in the role of Bruce Banner (much better/more believable than Eric Bana) as RDJ did in the role of Tony Stark.

_________________
...