joxur wrote:
How similar is EQ2 bard to EQ1 bard?
Not very similar at all, Jox. I loved my EQ1 Bard. But my EQ2 Troub annoys the shit out of me. Charm is a pulling tool in EQ2, and that's about it; Mez helps somewhat but is single-target only; Buffs are permanently up once you sing them, so combat is purely based on melee attacks and ranged sonic attacks (which are weak compared to other Scouts and make for a very challenging soloing ability); kiting is difficult in EQ2 without some form of snare as mobs move at the speed of light to engage you; etc.
In short, all of the EQ1 Bard tactics are out the window, and it's a completely different feel. Some like it, some don't. I love my Troub in groups, for example. He kicks ass there. Just so long as you don't parse yourself and realize that the main healer of the group is out-parsing you for damage.
Rugen - yeah, that's what I was afraid of. The forums there don't look overly busy. And the last I checked, alot of the old-schoolers such as Tirna, Daas, Aeralla, etc. that I knew had moved on to other guilds or other games, so I'm not sure who's still in there that I'd recognize (if anyone at all - there was a lot of new blood even when Daas left back in 2007).
*edit* - quick update, I just noticed the Bard TSO AAs. Absolutely sick.
They just went from giving the group 7.5% melee/spell crits to about 21-22% crit rate. And got a self-buff that adds a DD proc on melee attacks for upwards of 700dmg. Sick.
I take back what I said above, they're now quite good and can reach upwards of 10+k in parses which is very respectable.