...since time doesn't exist inside a spacetime singularity, like a black hole or the universe in its earliest conditions, our current scientific understanding removes the possibility of a Creator, at least in this sense of the word.

Indeed, since time doesn't exist inside a spacetime singularity, like a black hole or the universe in its earliest conditions, our current scientific understanding removes the possibility of a Creator, at least in this sense of the word.

Beyond that, the non-existence of time inside a singularity is still theoretical, even if mathematically sound.

It's even smaller than "subatomic" -- it's sub-nucleus, all the parts that make up protons and neutrons (quarks) are really fucked up pieces of physics.

Not having watched the videos yet, I'm going to assume that he's boiling things down to basics, rather than delving deep into the component particles of protons.

Protons are made up of two up quarks and a down quark. Occasionally a fourth quark is seen inside a proton (a "strange" quark), which will disappear as fast as it appeared.

This is why the religious side will always have the advantage in the eyes of the common populace.

To be at the absolute pinnacle of theological expertise as it relates to this argument, you need only be able to utter the words, "God did it."

To be considered even partially knowledgeable in the scientific fields that relate to this topic...well, it takes a bit of specialization.

Yet is your understanding of this any different than the belief in creation? Do you have any grasp at all of what is being said or are you blindly believing that its true or could be true because its science. Ignorance is ignorance under any veil.

It's cute when the religious side tries to paint science as being equally about "faith".

1) You're assuming that no one in this thread - specifically myself - either knows or is capable of knowing anything about this topic. Bad news, that's your first mistake.

Sorry for thinking you a dumbass, my bad.

Scroll up