I do not recognize those who do break the rules of a board.
Having determined the rules from those who actually set them numerous times, and having seen a
Mod sanctioned for breaking them
twice, I know that those who "moderate" out of spite are not moderating according to the rules.
I renew the suggestion that those who act out of emotion engage their critical thinking. Else they become hypocrites.
It is that simple.
Since I have erased those who
lie in this fashion-for such is a waste of time and antithetical to critical thinking--whomever is trying to
pretend information does not exist by
suppressing it should use another modality to communicate. I would suggest doing so through an objective
Adminstrator. I do not expect appeals to reasonableness to be heeded given previous behavior from such cypers, but I am always willing to be "surprised."
There is a line about the "insolence of office."
Those who do not "like" a thread simply
cease reading and contributing to it. It is really that simple.
Right, the original thread:
Typical of those who cannot handle evidence that makes them uncomfortable, an individual tries to delete information.
A bit like a Creationist trying to pretend science does not exist.
Nevertheless, here is what the threads actually said:
Right.
Venen wrote:
Since you failed to counter anything I said, fair to steal one of your own quotations?
That you ignore the rebuttals to your claims do not mean they have not been made.
Sticking your fingers in your eyes is not an argument. Did not work for Peter Gabriel, how should it work for you? [Stop that.--Ed.]
Quote:
Perhaps you'd like to respond to one of us. . . .
Perhaps you would like to read the thread, because you would find that.
Cannot "read for you."
--J.D.
Venen wrote:
I had a feeling you wouldn't be able to resist that last one.
I rather find ignoring
Lies difficult, yes.
Quote:
To deny that any rebuttals on my part were made is the kind of douchebaggery that's already been pointed out.
If you consider yourself a "douchebag" I will not disabuse you of that opinion of yourself. However, should you actually
read the thread, you might actually make a rebuttal.
Until then you are being--to use your vernacular--a "douchebag."
Then defends the practice of accusing Jewish scholars of being Anti-Semitic because their conclusions make the accuser cry.Pathetic, but, given your willful ignorance demonstrated above, unfortunately not surprising.
--J.D.
It is unfortunate, but the one who did not bother to read the Thread Original, decided he would just close it because . . . well . . . "those darned old facts scare me!"
Pathetic.
Though I would recommend that those who made decisions that ended up getting reversed with apologies
more than once might want to "check" with their superiors before acting out again.
--J. "He Brings Down the Fire from the Sky!" D.
