http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32197648/ns ... _politics/

Wow. Woooooowwwww. That's all I can say.

_________________

I wonder if he needs to be on meds?

I've only recently heard this guy on talk radio. He is a nut job.

Hahah yeah he is a nut job, good listening though!

_________________
"Creating Havoc and Pie Since 2001!"
My Website: http://www.anthonyhays.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/cakvala

I need to quit posting while intoxicated. I don't even remember posting this. LOL

_________________

you're browsing msnbc while drunk? you do realize there is porn on the internet, right?

_________________

Drunk internet surfing is like sober internet surfing for me. I do the same shit, it's just vastly more amusing.

_________________

OK, I have FOX on in the background...only because I have no choice in what other news I can listen to on my TV. Unfortunately, Glenn Beck is on and I have to admit something...few people have inspired me to want to become violent like he does. I want to get him a locked cage for 2...maybe 3 minutes...to just fuck his face and jaw up until there is nothing left but mush, impossible to reconstruct for years to come even with the most advanced surgical techniques. I just want to punish him.

I have to ask, WHO THE FUCK gave this incompetent asshat a show? Oh, wait, FEUX NEWS did. This just goes to show, like all of the other FEAX NEWS assclowns that have been given a spot on their network - Anyone that follows this fucking network like its cool is a total fucking loser and would be better off chambering a shell in their Jesus-lovin' shotgun with the business end in their piehole and pull the trigger.

Worthless...utterly and completely worthless is what Glenn Beck is to this earth. May your asshole rot of the most sinister, aggressive, and painful cancer if you actually place any value on that jerkoff.

It's no worse then watching Oberman every night.

Obama has said more then enough on his own to fuck with race relations. He single handedly turned this Gates thing into twice as big a shit storm as it already was by cracking off at the mouth without knowing anything about it, and said as much before he decided to interject.

_________________
Marauder Harabakc Goat

He's well beyond nutjob at this point. He's one of the few people besides Michael Savage that I can't really fathom why there's an audience for.

He has a serious case of ADD...when you watch him, he bounces all over the place. I want to grab his shoulders and tell him to SIT STILL...

_________________

Of course, Glenn Beck is nuts...but who knows if Obama is racist? <3

savage is way more entertaining, at least he's not politics 24/7.

That means he's still several years behind Keith Olbermann, Chris Matthews, and myriad other worshippers of an almighty central government.
This reminds me of the famous comment by Pauline Kael, who said (according to the New York Times), “I live in a rather special world,” Miss (Pauline) Kael said, continuing: “I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them.” Nothing says "snob" or "elitist" quite like that.

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

Really? I mean, seriously, someone thinks Michael Savage is completely ridiculous and doesn't understand why he has an audience, and you think they sound snobbish? You're a moron.

_________________

lol... what the hell? :p

Don't either bother. We established long ago he's a fucking donk.

Excuse me?
Venen stated he can't understand why Beck and Savage (and, presumably, others) have any listeners/viewers. His tone was definitely dismissive of anyone who listens to Beck, Savage, and others, as if to say that anyone who isn't a Barry backer is a conspiracy theorist or a backwoods hick.
Cool. I've been dissed by Tyral. My life is now complete.

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

BTW...

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com/2009 ... nents.html
Evidently, we're supposed to want the US to become a socialist/Marxist country, or else we're homicidally insane. And you guys are calling the Obama critics crazy?

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

Actually, we're calling all of you partisan fucktards crazy. This includes you. I guess it's a good thing you admit to "making a mistake voting for Bush in 04". Of course, you probably couldn't tells us why in a coherent fashion.

Obama is yet another in a long line of pandering politicians that shitheads like you keep in power because it's more a popularity contest than it is about the issues. I've seen your rants before, and called you out on your not-even-Ron-Paul-consistent ideas of constitutionalism and states rights. You're not a conservative, you're a partisan hack, like many on the boards here.

Who, exactly, are "we" and "you"? And what, exactly, is a "conservative" to you (or a "moderate," "liberal," etc.)?

Don't blame me for putting Barry and his 40-some-odd extraconstitutional czars into office. I may have voted for Bush, but I realized it was a mistake, and said so. (http://eqasylum.yuku.com/topic/1398?page=1)

One of the bad things about what's happening with Obama is that it's re-energizing the Republicans. The Democrats in charge are no good, but the Republicans who'd presumably replace them aren't a whole lot better, and in some ways might even be worse. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm being a shithead and a partisan hack again. It must be true, because some guy on the internet says so.

So, Mr. "I don't vote for pandering politicians," who did you vote for? Bet it was either Barry or his clone from Arizona. And what are the real "issues" you care so much about? Do you even know what's in the Constitution about anything, much less what it says about how anything not specifically enumerated therein is reserved for the people and the states? No, I didn't think so.

Jackass.

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

While Bale certainly is a total idiot, he has in the past written a long diatribe about his dislike for Bush.

A bit late, and I'll go ahead and take it back...to a degree. I've seen you go absolutely batshit with regards to ANYTHING that involves a Dem for the most part, with the usual parroting of whatever the party line is bitching about. OMG THE MESSIAH!



On this point, we agree. But once again, in the past, I've seen you towing party line /shrug.



While this may amuse you, I didn't vote for either. I voted for local and state government. You know, the ones that matter most in my day to day. Issues I care about are fiscal conservatism, social liberalism, and low taxes and small government.

Now, as for the Constitution, I'm fairly close to being Jefferson Constitutionalist. That said, I think there are areas that require mandates from the federal government. Accreditation of colleges, educational standards (not no child left behind ;P), protection of civil rights (slavery, women, gays, abortion), and also health care. Federal Healthcare more because if the rest of government is trimmed down, the required operation will be more streamlined and transparent. There are instances where the federal government is required to supercede states' rights that aren't clearly defined in the constitution. Note my use of the word clearly. There was another thread where I saw you ranting about states' rights w/o it being too coherent. It just sounded like you were another ex-neocon bandwagon jumper turned half ass Ron Pauler at the time. If that was not the case, I'll take it back. But I've yet to see much more beyond the usual neocon stances minus a few exceptions. Once again, if I'm wrong in that regard, I'll take it back.

But your last post? It was fucking retarded. Even you can admit that. Messiah? Really? Drop knowledge, instead of insults (or include it with insults like I do!), and maybe it won't sound as kneejerk retarded.



Great, and after your last post in this thread, I'll take jackass as opposed to just plain ass.

It's been awhile. A LOT longer than I thought. Sorry, RL got in the way, and will continue to be in the way for a long time.



As opposed to most of the usual suspects on the left, who immediately turn anything and everything into "OMG, capitalism is terrible, Bush is Satan, America is a terrible country that's destroying the planet, all Christians hate gays and all Republicans are haters and anyone else I don't like is a hater and judgmental and needs to DIE DIE DIE!!!1!!1!"

But enough about Fribur (for now).



Who doesn't?



Much of which is in line with me. I knew Obama was no good because he never said who he is or what he stands for until he was elected, and even then he's tried to hide it. And McCain isn't a lot better because he's tried like hell to limit people's ability to participate in politics via their First Amendment rights. I wasn't about to reward either one of them with my vote.



The Constitution states what areas the federal government is supposed to be involved with. If you read it, it's apparent the Founders never intended for this country to be ruled by a ruling elite the way we have for a century. The idea was for the people to take care of themselves and one another. Failing that, the states were resposible to care for their citizens. The federal government was strictly limited to only a few things, simply because the Founders had first-hand experience of life under a monarchy. Remember, too, that Britain was probably the most liberal Western country at the time, yet the Founders were so incensed at the lack of true freedoms they enjoyed that they fought and died to create a country that was based upon freedoms and liberties that nobody else had.



No child left behind is a mess. Bush was responsible for it, both because it has teachers worry about "teaching to the test" rather than actually educating kids, and because he allowed a ard named Kennedy to write the damn bill. Basically, a bad idea all around.

Thanks again, George.



The first three not only are covered by previous constitutional amendments (primarily "equal protection under the law"), but are common sense. Abortion, you're going to have a fight from me because I consider it to be murder to kill a child. But I also recognize that an awful lot of people disagree. And it doesn't matter what anyone's opinion is right now, anyway, because the Supreme Court's not going to overturn Roe v. Wade anytime soon because it generates a lot of hysteria, and therefore money, for too many people.



If health care/medicine is a right, does that also mean food, shelter, clothing, and anything else are also "rights?" Then there's air, and water, both of which are seen as "rights" by -- well, everyone, but especially environmentalists. I'm not saying it's good that a lot of people lack health insurance. But some things are more necessary to survival than the ability to see a doctor. Besides, for the last 24 years anyone can go to a hospital for medical assistance, regardless of ability to pay. And, if the health care "reform" debate is about covering the uninsured, there are ways to do so without grabbing between 1/6 and 1/7 of Amerioca's assets to pay for it.



You're being waaaayyyyyy too naive here, Tali. I know you were in the military, and you're not a kid (I think mid-30s). In your experience, when has *anything* involving the government actually been trimmed down, streamlined, or more "transparent"? The pols and bureaucrats may talk a good game, but it's just a lot of bullshit meant to make sure we keep the same people in power, because "he (or she) is fighting for me."



That's exactly the opposite of the contents and intent of the Constitution. Like I said earlier, the power is supposed to reside with the states and the people, not in Washington. The central government is supposed to basically keep its damn nose out of everyone's business. We, the people, are supposed to be the guarantors of liberty. You may disagree, and use the example of forced integration as an example of how I'm wrong. However, I suspect that, for every use of Army troops to protect civil rights by integrating a school in the South in the '50s or '60s, you can come up with an example of the federal government wrecking civil rights in some other way, like the Elian Gonzalez fiasco or the "cap and trade (money into Al Gore's bank account)" bill, or distoring the construction of families via tax laws that make it financially more rewarding for couples not to marry (for example).

There's a reason not to put much faith in government. It's good to see that more and more people are seeing the point. Hopefully they won't be steered into believing some other politician's load of crap before they can bring about the real change the country actually needs.



My apologies for not being more clear at the time.



Bandwagon jumper? Bush and friends tried their best to use the people and ideas of many good people in order to push his progressive agenda. Like the original progressives, he used his office to push an agenda that grew the government and took away individual rights. And he did so while using moralistic rhetoric, just like Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Why the hell would I want to jump on *that* bandwagon? My biggest concern in '04 was that he was better for national defense than Kerry was. I still believe that to a degree, but I also know that voters needed better candidates than either of those two were.

Ron Paul has some decent ideas, and a few that are way out there. He would've won the nomination, in my opiion, except for his odd ideas (mainly about Israel) and the fact there was no way in hell the Republican power brokers were going to let anyone other than McCain get the nomination.



Apology accepted.


Well, I dunno, Tali. Ever listen to the network news, or NPR, or an awful lot of Democrats? They seem to have this breathlessness when they speak of Barry, sort of like a high school bimbo who just got hit on by the cute-guy quarterback. "Oh, he's soo adorable, and smart, and suave, and talented, and he knows so much more tha anyone else, and he plays sports, and he cares about the environment and my Aunt Betty's health insurance and Fribur's man-crush, and he knows all the best things to say and he sounds so good when he says them. Plus everyone says he's gonna save the world from itself because he says he's a citizen of the world and not just a dumb American, and he won the Nobel peace prize, and he's just sooo monderful! I can't stand it!!!"

They act like the man is a god. You go to a store, and what do you see? Obama shirts, hats, mugs, bumper stickers, posters, notebooks, book covers, coloring books, children's books, biographies (all hagiographic, of course), autobiographies, magazines, DVD's, table covers -- the list goes on and on. And if anyone says anything critical of the man, he or she is seen as an idiot, a mutant, or -- worst of all -- a non-believer. Because, to Barry's supporters, Obama's not just a politician. He's essentially a god, a messiah who'll make everything all right. He'll heal race relations. He'll cause people in other countries to love us again. He'll heal the sick and give us all free medical coverage. He'll save the planet. He'll even give people money, gasoline, and houses out of the goodness of his heart. Hell, the poor reporters on NPR blamed everyone for the loss of Ted Kennedy's seat on everyone and everything -- except Obama, even though his policies are what got people so pissed that they refused to vote for yet another progressive Democrat to be US Senator from Massachusetts. No, instead we're told that we must believe. Believe? In what? Another damn lying politican who wants to take from the people and give to his cronies? He's not a messiah, he's a fraud. And therefore, he is someone to be mocked and ridiculed - preferably by reminding him and his followers what he is not.



Bravo!



I'm not sure if that's half a compliment or three-quarters of an insult, but whatever. Thanks for playing!

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

BTW, sorry for the long reply. It's been months, and it'll likely be months before I have a chance to come back.

Yeah, yeah. "And there was much rejoicing."

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

lol he must like me :p

I don't care if you misrepresent me. But NPR is nothing like what you just described.

I'm surprised you managed to keep your train of thought long enough to write that large paragraph of fiction.



Woah, political figures likenesses on items?! Books about them? THAT'S NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE! Stop the presses!



Who are these people you've talked to? Have you actually talked to anyone like that? Or is it just an image that you've made up in your mind after listening to Fox News or Glenn Beck?

He will respond to you in 9 weeks because he is simply too busy to take 15 minutes out of his day/week/month to read a message board.

haha this thread is terrible and bale is terrible

_________________

Sounds like penis envy.

For the record, I was an Obama supporter, and I would say I still am, but really it was just Time for a Democrat. After the first couple of debates, I wanted Biden/Obama. In eight years, it'll be time for the Republicans to come back, but for now we need a Democratic administration, because an even balance of power over time is essential to the two-party system.

_________________

Yeah, you can only let Democrats cave to every whim and desire of Republicans for so long before you have to gridlock things for a little bit. It's a holding maneuver.

As an Aggie named Binkee, do you really have any right to call names?

And Binkee/Randy/whateverthefuck, I don't give a rat's ass if you think I'm terrible.

Not my fault you have a schlort. Maybe Venen can lend you his tweezers once he's done pleasuring himself.

Wow, how droll. You haven't lost your sense of humor. What next, another round of correcting grammar and spelling errors? Or did you finally give that up? And are you still surfing the net on company time, Neesha? Bet your employer loves paying you to do something other than your job. Maybe you have a career in politics ahead of you, though, given how much taxpayers enjoy paying their representatives to do everything except what they're supposed to do -- such as represent them and their interests, not those of their financial benefactors.

No, not really.
"You can mock me if you want -- but you can't say anything against my media friends/propaganda source!" But yes, they really were acting like a bunch of fucking crybabies the day after Brown won the Massachusetts Senate race -- whether you admit it or not. Too bad you can't be a man and admit that NPR is as biased as any other "news" source, and that the commentators on (among others} "All Things Considered" acted like they'd never seen a New England Republican who won an important election before.

Jeez, I'm surprised you were capable of keeping your train of though long enough to write that sentence.
Not surpisingly, you missed the point. Just out of curiosity, how many Obama coloring books have you bought for yourself, anyway? Or did your mommy tell you that you've gotten enough new toys today, you'll have to do without? The crying jag that produced must've embarrassed the shit out of her.
All I have to do is stop by these boards or read a newspaper, and my point is proved. Your own post shows I'm right.

Incidentally, it's good to see that any dissent against a progressive is greeted with cries akin to, "shut up, you idiot" and the like, but everyone has to accept the commentary of progressives at face value or be accused of censorship or, again, stupidity. Gotta love that "right to free speech" thing when yours is the only side that's allowed to be right!

Finally, to those of you who so loathe Fox News (which, as I said before, I seldom watch): If you don't like it, change the channel! (That's the progressive rejoinder to "those GD Christians who criticize network tv," isn't it?) But you have no right to censor what's said on that channel -- or really, who says what, anywhere. If you do, then your self-righteous demands for free speech and a free press are nothing but lies.

Ta~!!

{edited a grammatical error to save Neesha the trouble.}

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

Like that great idea, No Child Left Behind, which was largely a Ted Kennedy concept. If you don't like that example, there's always holding up judicial appointments, or withholding appropriations bills so necessary things can't be bought so that the president will look bad, or myriad other examples of politicians screwing around instead of doing their job of upholding the Constitution.

This is the best you guys can come up with? Really? I knew the boards had deteriorated badly over the years, but this is just pathetic.

Lastly, is Leo running for Congress again this year? I saw his former opponent's brother isn't running, and was wondering if Leo's going to take another shot at it this time.

Ta, again!

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

Every time you post, Bale, you look more unhinged. Mockery, friendly warning, concerned message, take it as you wish. But it's truth.

Now that's just uncalled for. I'm not an aggie.

_________________

I just don't even know where to begin with you, Bale, so I think I'll just go away now.

What is truth, Syuni? And whose truth are we using? I know you mean well, because you've always been fair to me. But frankly, I refuse to allow a bunch of asswipes who've spent the last decade or so determining what's right and wrong based upon their own warped senses of morality and justice, while saying that "judging" others is an absolute wrong, and hammering others who disagree with them for being "bigots" and "idiots" and all the other names that are routinely used against non-progressives.

You weren't the one who wrote this, but several years ago it was all wonderful to probably the majority of people who post here when someone wrote how he wished George Bush had splattered himself all over the flight deck of an aircraft carrier. Were anyone to say a similar thing about Barry, however, that person would (rightly) be criticized for being an asshole and worse. And yet -- isn't all of this hypersensitivity about offending someone cutting off debate that needs to be held? It's all well and good if we offend one group -- Christians, say -- but absolutely horrific if we say something that offends a different group -- take your pick. And if the critic is like Joxur, who loathed Bush and who is now opposed to much of Barry's agenda, that's the worst of the worst -- a veritable traitor to the cause of Progressivism. Which, I believe, is the reason there's so much hatred of Joxur -- he's not held captive by ideology in the way that many others are. He may not be right about a lot, but I have to say that I admire anyone who can stand up to a bunch of bullies who cannot accept anything other than doing things their way. And it's the same thing with Beck. Many people can't handle being told the would-be emperor has no clothes, so they instead try to shut him up, one way or another -- even saying that Beck, a self-described Christian, hates Christianity because his faith differs from that of Obama's spiritual advisors.

My apologies. I thought you were one because you used to use their symbol as your icon. On the other hand, it could be worse -- you could've gone to Loser Slug University (LSU).

OK. Whatever.

_________________
"The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

-- Marcus Tullius Cicero

This is like communication via horseback! If I insult Bale now, I can brace myself for the sting of his comeback in 3 months.

I don't want him to stop though... I've never really met someone quite as insane before, and I enjoy reading his diatribes when he comes around.

Um, hope I'm not replying too fast for you by only taking one month rather than three. Don't want to be unfair to you.
You know the old showbiz cliche -- always leave them wanting more!

Really, I don't know that I'm insane, Fribur, espcially compared to you. You're the one who wants to end America's national sovereignty in favor of establishing a global government, after all. And while you were all over Bush for doing his best to take away various civil rights and liberties via the Patriot Act and other initiatives (like I was), where have you been with Obama's attempts to do the same thing? I suspect you're fine with his attempts to shut down free speech on his own and via proxies because it will help his cause, simply because he has "D" after his name and he's a fan of socialism.

Until next time....

Hey Bale.

That guy in your avatar.

He doesn't happen to play Left Field, does he?

Just wondering.

lol see? I've never said any of that, yet here we are :p I want to abolish US sovereignty and set up a worldwide socialist government!

You heard it here first, folks.

I'm guessing you have a mustache, Fribur. Just like Hitler and Mother Teresa. *nods sagely* *points to concentric circles on blackboard*

I rest my case.

_________________
Hope is the new black.

Glenn Beck Attacks President's Daughter -- Days After Insisting That Families Of Public Figures Should Not Be Attacked

I really don't like this man.

I mean, I really, really don't like this man:



I gotta give it to him though, this was pretty brilliant:

He does that a lot. Just refer to the Louis Black thing about him pretending to be offended about people comparing Arizona's law to Nazi Germany...when he's the biggest Godwin-law-violater in history, possibly.